Исходное сообщение
"Ричард Столлман выступил против добавления поддержки отладчи..." Отправлено Аноним, 09-Фев-15 07:16
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg004... Speking as the original author of GUD, I'm in favor of it supporting LLVM and everything else imaginable.  But I hadn't been planning to weigh in on the question until I realize that Richard and everyone else may be carrying around a false premise: namely, that GCC's dominance in its functional category *can* be preserved. I'm pretty sure this is not true.  If the clang/LLVM people decide they want to eat GCC's lunch, they *will* do it.  The reason has nothing to do with any philosophical issue but merely the fact that compiler technology has advanced significantly in ways that GCC is not well positioned to exploit.  The clang/LLVM people have both a clean-sheet technology advantage and Apple's money to fund a high-quality implementation with; FSF cannot match either. Already my own experiments suggest that LLVM is a superior compiler, by every metric I know of, at least in deployments that don't require bug-for-bug compatibility with GCC.  If GCC were to vanish from existence tomorrow I'm not sure I myself would be even seriously inconvenienced.  CC=clang in one dotfile; problem solved, done.

Ваше сообщение
Имя*:
EMail:	Для отправки ответов на email укажите знак ! перед адресом, например, !user@host.ru (!! - не показывать email). Более тонкая настройка отправки ответов производится в профиле зарегистрированного участника форума.
Заголовок*:
Сообщение*:	> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg00457.html > Speking as the original author of GUD, I'm in favor of it > supporting > LLVM and everything else imaginable. But I hadn't been planning to > weigh in on the question until I realize that Richard and everyone > else may be carrying around a false premise: namely, that GCC's > dominance in its functional category *can* be preserved. > I'm pretty sure this is not true. If the clang/LLVM people > decide > they want to eat GCC's lunch, they *will* do it. The > reason has > nothing to do with any philosophical issue but merely the fact that > compiler technology has advanced significantly in ways that GCC is not > well positioned to exploit. The clang/LLVM people have both a > clean-sheet technology advantage and Apple's money to fund a > high-quality implementation with; FSF cannot match either. > Already my own experiments suggest that LLVM is a superior compiler, > by every metric I know of, at least in deployments that don't > require > bug-for-bug compatibility with GCC. If GCC were to vanish from > existence tomorrow I'm not sure I myself would be even seriously > inconvenienced. CC=clang in one dotfile; problem solved, done.
	Введите код, изображенный на картинке: